<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://codeforeternity.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>LINQ ElementAt and ElementAtOrDefault</title><link>http://codeforeternity.com/blogs/technology/archive/2008/08/13/linq-elementat-and-elementatordefault.aspx</link><description>We can use the ElementAt extension method of LINQ to return the element at a specified index (zero based) in a sequence. However the ElementAt extension method would throw the System.ArguementOutOfRangeException when the specified index is a negative</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>LINQ ElementAt and ElementAtOrDefault</title><link>http://codeforeternity.com/blogs/technology/archive/2008/08/13/linq-elementat-and-elementatordefault.aspx#254</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:18:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6581de12-b79f-4db0-af9f-717dfd7c7876:254</guid><dc:creator>DotNetKicks.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://codeforeternity.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=254" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>